www.mage-net.net

I've been saying for awhile now Haringey Adult Social Care are going to kill someone. (Children's Services have several times) They are rude, inhumane and unaware or just don't care about the harm they are doing. They refuse to listen to the service users, and have a god-complex in dealing with people. The LGO (who are useless) provide a yearly overview of the council and give a statistical view of their performance.
As of this meeting has not taken place.
In at a Adults & Health Scrutiny Panel I accused Haringey Council of having removed the humanity from Aid & Adaptations process and Haringey Council in General. I further stated Haringey Council had no understanding of the need for Equipment. That they just see an Inventory Item, an expense, not a lifeline.

This case involves Occupational Therapy, Councillors and Accountability

Haringey Council
do NOT like being chanlledge, told they are wrong or being held accountable.
On I was given incorrect advice By The OT. The God Complex prevented them from listening to my comments, I was put in a position of having to waste my time proving them WRONG
God Complex
On after a lot of effort the Wheelchair Service attended my home
I demonstrated the issue so they could see the problem and not rely on my description.
On a Letter was sent with the observations from the above appointment.
I TOLD you
After being HUMILIATED you would think Haringey Council would behave and try to cooperate. However you would also be WRONG
A ward councillor had also doubled-down on my need for an electric wheelchair.
On I forwarded the Original comments and the Letter , , and an individual within Haringey. Who was a mistake On my part (but they never responded)
On I chased , , , ,
Lotte Collett
the email of
On I forwarded the complaint to
Fiona Alderman (Monitoring Office)

A Legal position with responsibilities set out in Law.
The Monitoring Officer
An entire trilogy could be written about the farse that is LBH/14492523
  • That makes the Complaint Acknowledgment LATE
  • That makes the Complaint Response LATE
  • That makes the Complaint Response irreverent to the complaint made
On
Vicky Murphy (Service Director & Deputy DASS Adults, Health and Communities)
responded to LBH/14492523.
It was a complete work of fiction, a complete white wash, more evidance she is in need of her p45
With comments such as
Clearly that is now no longer a feasible option.
It was never an option the OT didn't listen to my objections regarding the electric wheelchair. Both in being eligible and my physical health concerns (self-propelling myself accounts for the majority of my exercise). The response fails to address that I was ignored, my feelings and lived experience over the entire debacle wasn't deemed relevant by Haringey Council, The OT and Now The Service Director. (i'd only been disabled 12 years) The response also attempts to remove Haringey Concil's duty of care and shift responcibility for the lift to my Physo
Not our problem
More importantly an an Adult Social Care Complaint, has a single stage.
The Monitoring Officer
I responded on I chased on , & I tadinational Haringey Council style the response received at was a Tolkienesque work of fiction. That never actually address the problems but gave multiple excuse that give credibility to my p45 claims. The individual who responded is away so nothing will be done till at the earliest

This case involves NRS

My Disability equipment (Hoist) broke on . @haringeycouncil, LG & SC Ombudsman, and
Catherine West ( MP / catherine.west.mp@parliament.uk)
Lucia das Neves (Woodside Councillor & Cabinet Member for Health, Social Care, and Wellbeing)
Lotte Collett (Woodside Councillor)

DO NOT CARE.

I have expressed my concerns about Haringey Council to Catherine West on multiple occasions The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea commissioned @NRSHealthcare to deal with such equipment I've had 5 different excuses why it's not been fixed. The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea don't appear to have a process for dealing with complaints.
On my complaint against NRS Was accepted as LBH/14268323 This was made on so the acknowledgment was LATE. A Response was due by . as per the complaint policy.
On I received an email from Kirsten Webb using the Corporate.Feedback@haringey.gov.uk Saying they needed more time and response would be received .
This is completely unacceptable

This case involves my wetroom.

A standard wet room the floor slopes towards the drain to aid the water run-off. This 'slope' has a secondary problematic effect. It's such as my Hoist and Shower Chair a not stable. https://youtu.be/l4TStFEXLZw